Honestly, can we talk about flower tags?
I've had it up to ... you know ... with flower tags.
'Alaqua' is just a recent example. This is the tag, and therefore the flower I was expecting.

The scanner boosted the yellow and faded the purple a bit, but other than that it's a fair copy. Look at those lovely rounded petals, like little circles. That is the flower I wanted. Not this. Hmm.
A similar thing happened to me with 'Russian Rhapsody'. See this previous post on the subject, an excerpt of which I reproduce here:
Check out the difference between the published photo and the actual flower for a plant that I bought in May this year.
The daylily I thought I bought (Russian Rhapsody) is shown in the first picture. The one that actually bloomed is shown in the second. Still a pretty daylily, but not what I thought I was getting.
![]() | ![]() |
But is this a tag problem, or a grower problem? ("Grower" meaning the large companies that grow plants for distribution to nurseries.) Why can't they produce plants whose flowers grow true to form and colour?
I was reading on a forum somewhere that it has to do with method of propagation. The large growers use tissue cultures to grow vast quantities of the same plant. The only problem is that that method is known to have problems producing plants that are "true" to the parent. (At least I think that is the gist of what people were saying on the forum.)
I guess I should just be happy with what I get and be done with it.
But really, these two daylilies in my front yard, planted less than two feet (60 cm) apart, are practically twins, even though they were supposed to be quite different, and they have different names and parentage. It's very strange. I will have to move one of them to another location in the garden. Arrgh!

Photo belongs to kbgardenblog.blogspot.com and may not be used without attribution.
Anyway, while we're on the subject of daylilies (surprise, surprise), here is a picture of my one new bloom today. (Which, by the way, seems to be a mini, a fact that was not mentioned at all on the tag.)
Elegant Candy

Photo belongs to kbgardenblog.blogspot.com and may not be used without attribution.















































